Sri Lanka massacred up to 40,000 Tamil civilians – former UN official

Sri Lanka’s military massacred as many as 40,000 Tamil civilians in the final onslaught against the Liberation Tigers in 2009, according to a former United Nations official with detailed knowledge of events, press reports said. The former United Nations’ spokesperson in Sri Lanka, Gordon Weiss, has resigned from the UN after 14 years and returned home to Australia, where he was interviewed by ABC News. “He’s now free to speak openly about the situation in Sri Lanka, for the first time and does so candidly and unflinchingly,” the media agency said.


“About 300,000 civilians, plus the Tamil Tiger forces, were trapped in an area of territory about the size of Central Park in New York,” says Weiss.

“They were within range of all the armaments that were being used, small and large, being used to smash the Tamil Tiger lines … the end result was that many thousands lost their lives.”

Gordon Weiss says his information comes from reliable sources who had a presence inside the battle zone, not Tamil civilians or fighters.

"The Sri Lankan government said many things which were either intentionally misleading, or were lies", Weiss told ABC’s reporter Eric Campbell.

Weiss says that after the war ended, a senior civil servant openly admitted that the authorities had deliberately underestimated the number of trapped civilians “as a ploy to allow the government to get on with its business.”

Soon after Sri Lanka’s declared victory over the LTTE in May 2009, the British newspaper, The Times, concluded an extensive investigation into the last days of the offensive and confirmed that up to 20,000 Tamil civilians were slaughtered.

Pointing out that not only the United Nations but several Western governments knew of the ongoing slaughter of Tamil civilians by the Sri Lanka Army, but kept silent for fear of upsetting the Colombo Government, The Times also demanded international action to prevent further atrocities.

“Such a monstrous collusion in covering up an atrocity must not go unchallenged. If the UN Human Rights Council refuses to investigate what has happened, the West must do so forthwith,” the paper said in an editorial.

“The silence of those who were warned of civilian deaths in Sri Lanka is shameful. They must speak out now to prevent future atrocities,” the editorial charged.

Development and Context of Eelam National Liberation

While Eelam National Liberation captures the emotions of most Eelam Tamils and even World Tamils, there are many outsiders and even some Tamils who do not have a clear understanding of it. Unless all the emotions resonate, they also could be counterproductive. Resonance in nature takes place when the induced frequency is the same as the natural frequency. In social life also, ideas become a material force if masses accept them as their own. This becomes possible only when Development of ideas match the Context. Both Development and Context imply Change.

If one avoids both ends to avoid speculation of the unknown, Evolution is a series of changes based on survival determined by resistance. It is a cause and effect frame and not a time frame. Evolution of man is based on collectivism, language and technology. When collectivism, language and technology interacted to reach an advanced mode of production called capitalism, evolution of Nations began. Thus a Nation is defined as a historical evolution of a community based on distinct territory, language, technology (economy) and culture. This period corresponded to about 12th, 13th centuries and it is to be noted that till about 1000 AD, earth’s resources were enough to provide for independent individual or tribal living. The Industrial Revolution facilitated the development of capitalism and the uneven distribution of resources resulted in uneven development of capitalism. Stronger Nations captured weaker Nations including Eelam and Sinhalam to be exploited for obtaining raw materials and for selling manufactured goods. The first phase of globalization in the form of advancing imperialism was completed when the whole world was shared between the imperialist powers and the first and second world wars were about redistributing the colonies. The resistance to this globalization produced the Russian Revolution of 1917 which developed to the extent of being the major player in ending the Second World War. Added to this the emergence of China after the war was a warning bell to the imperialist powers and the “free for all” oppression became a conscious planned oppression.

Countries whose borders were drawn without any consideration to the Nations constituting those countries, were given “independence” often without a struggle as in the then “Ceylon” and political power was transferred to the dominant Nations of the countries while the economic power was retained by the imperialist powers. It is to be noted that imperialism has been divided with the political component mainly in the hands of dominant Nations of countries with the economic component in the hands of the former imperialist powers. Thus the foundation was laid for the dominant Nations with State power and other Nations without State to enter into civil wars while the economic domination of the world continues with least resistance. Is it any wonder that the dominant Nations of India, Pakistan, China and indeed the entire third world develop a bond with the Government of Sri Lanka whose dominant Nation is Sinhalam? Is it not foolishness on the part of Eelam Tamils to expect justice from the Western governments who masterminded the conflicts in their own interest or from Delhi, Beijing and similar whose dominant Nations have oppressed other Nations in varying degrees? Of course these centers of power have contradictions among themselves and we need to make use of them but we cannot do that by tailing behind any power and more importantly we should have a strong friendly alliance with all oppressed Nations without State and other oppressed peoples.

The conscious plan for oppression by the imperialism did not stop with the above design alone. They knew that the power of the Socialist Countries (it was not Socialism but State Capitalism with better income distribution) need to be curtailed. They succeeded by undermining the bureaucracy of the Socialist countries by various carrot and stick methods and promoting the Globalization of capital. The dominance of the globalised capital is indeed the second phase of globalization. Thus the “free market capital” of the imperialist countries joined hands with the State capital of the Socialist countries under globalised capital and during the first Iraq war, a unipolar world was established and the Bipolar world of the cold war days was history. A unipolar world with full of contradictions is unstable and by the time of the second Iraq war a multi polar world was emerging. The environmental crisis and the current economic recession have made the multi polar world irreversible. More of the multi polar powers are outside the West which is certainly a declining force. In a multi polar setting, we should have relationship with all powers but should not tail behind any power and certainly not behind the declining one. Also the neighboring power could be more dangerous due to proximity which the Vietnamese realized in time. But the multi polar setting is certainly good for the smaller ones and in particular to the Nations without State.

The Eelam National struggle started as a peaceful political resistance as soon as the Sinhalam began to exercise the political imperialism it got from the imperialists and demonstrated with depriving citizenship to one million Tamils and with the colonization of the Tamil homeland. The peaceful resistance was suppressed for 30 years violently by State terrorism and chauvinist hooliganism with regular racial riots ignored by the international community but intensifying all the time resulting in armed resistance. The armed resistance was initially a reaction to the chauvinist ethnic hooliganism and state terrorism and naturally the resistance had similar dimension but soon developed as a Liberation movement and the targets were confined to economic and military targets. However though this transformation placed the LTTE on the wrong side of the West and India, the reliance of the traditional Tamil political leadership on the West and India, gave the wrong impression of the Liberation movement to the rest of the world. A situation arose when the west and India banned the LTTE and stopped supplies while the rest of the world (though did not block supplies to LTTE) politically took the side of the government of Sri Lanka. Thus the Liberation movement became friendless in the external world except Diaspora (whose hands were tied) support and this led to the defeat of the LTTE by the government of Sri Lanka with the backing of 20 powerful governments.

TNA and Diaspora should not make the same mistake again though the timeframe for the next phase of the Liberation struggle cannot be defined. The Presidential election 2010 has shown clearly that even semi devolution of power (not to mention recognition of the right of Self Determination) is unlikely by negotiation. Now that the sharing of spoils of war has been decided locally, the international powers will be concerned with their shares and not the well being of Eelam Tamils.

The Right of Self Determination of Eelam Tamils is naturally linked with the right of Self Determination of all Nations without State which are claimed to number around 3000 to 9000 but two hundreds and ten of them have been well documented in a book published by James Minahan (compare with 192 countries in UN). The recognition of the right of Self Determination of all Nations in the world is the next major Destination on the critical path (need to be achieved to move towards other subsequent Destinations) of civilization eliminating oppression of Nations by other Nations. However this does not eliminate other forms of oppression. National Liberation is essentially a Political Process (guaranteeing political power to the Nation) to be followed by Economic Liberation ending economic oppression and establishment of a Socialist Society which is a further advancement in the interaction among Collectivism, Language and Technology. Further interaction would lead to Communism and Fellowship of beings and things leading to the contradiction free Destination of Merger as One, the ultimate expression of collectivism. Even if there are disagreements about subsequent Destinations including “ultimate” Liberation but if there is agreement about the nearest Destination we should unite with all such agreeable forces. If Socialists, Communists, Spiritualists including Liberation Theologists agree on the question of National Liberation, then we should develop unity and solidarity with all of them.

The immediate physical survival of Eelam Tamils (who are either IDP’s or in open prison under occupation) and the ultimate recognition of the right of Self Determination are twin priorities. The sixty year struggle of Eelam Tamils is silenced for the time being and it is the duty of the Diaspora to assist in reducing that “time being”. The Diaspora is living in multicultural countries and has to fall in line with the laws of those countries but have a stake in the Eelam Tamil Nation as well as the Tamilnadu Tamil Nation (the only Tamil Nations in the world) because they are the sources of multi culturalism of the Diaspora. National Development and governance is possible only in these two Nations with territories historically. There is no room for transnational government but a strong and powerful world body is urgently needed. The GTF should fulfill this need and if those in charge cannot deliver, they should let others. If you can neither lead nor follow, please get out.

Massacres of Tamils 1956-2008

The Importance of Recording Contemporary History

Book review by Veluppillai Thangavelu, President, Thamil Creative Writers Association, Canada, January 17, 2010

India and Sri Lanka have been inhabited by Thamils from the beginning of recorded history. The ancient history of Thamil Nadu dates back to about 6000 years and their origin is topic of debate related to the Aryan invasion theory. This theory espouses the view that the Thamils belong to the Dravidian race and were part of the early Indus Valley settlers. Later with the advent of the Aryan invasion the Dravidians were forced to move Deep South where they ultimately settled. The present day states of Thamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh constitute the Dravidian culture. Kerala where Thamil Chera kings ruled lost its identity due to influx of Brahmins from the North.

The Thamils were seafaring people. They traded with Rome in the days of Emperor Augustus. They sent ships to many lands bordering the Indian Ocean and with the ships went traders, scholars and a way of life. The island of Ceylon which was separated from the Indian subcontinent by less than 30 miles of water was not unknown to the Thamils who called it Eelam.

Thamil Sangam literature dating from the 1st century BC to 2nd century AD speaks of three ruling families in India: the Cholas, the Pandyas and the Cheras.
South India was divided into several broad geographical-cum-cultural zones, known as Nadus.

During the later half of 4th century, Pallavar the great temple builders emerged into prominence and dominated the South for another 400 years. A large part of Thamil Nadu was ruled by then with Kanchipuram as their capital. In the 6th century they defeated the Cholas and extended their rule as far as Ceylon. Among the greatest Pallavar rulers were Mahendravarman l and his son Narasimhavarman. Dravidian architecture reached its epitome during Pallavar rule. The last Pallavar King was Aparajitha. He was defeated by Aditya Chola towards the end of the 9th century.

The basin of the Kaveri River became the Chola heartland known as Chola Nadu. Pandi Nadu was ruled by Pandya monarchs with Madurai the capital. Kongu Nadu in and around Coimbatore was at times in the hands of the Cheras of Kerala along the western Malabar Coast and at times controlled by the rulers of the Thamil region. At the height of Chola power between 1000 and 1100 the Chola empire encompassed all these regions.

Under Rajaraja Chola 1 and his son Rajendra Chola 1, the Cholas again rose as a formidable power in the 9th century in South India. The Chola empire extended to the central Indian states like Orissa and parts of West Bengal. Rajaraja Chola 1 conquered the eastern Chalukya kingdom by defeating the Cheras and also occupied greater part of Ceylon by defeating the Pandyas. Rajendra Chola 1 went beyond occupying the islands of Andaman and Nicobar, Lakshadweep, Sumatra, Java, Malaya and the islands of Pegu with his fleet of ships. He defeated Mahipala, the king of Bihar and Bengal, and to mark his victory he built a new capital called Gangaikonda Cholapuram. The Cholas started losing their power around the 13th century.

As Cholas declined, the Pandyas once again emerged as a power in the early 14th century. But this was short lived and soon they were subdued by Muslim Khilji invaders from the north in 1316. The city of Madurai was plundered and completely destroyed. The invasion destroyed the Chola and Pandya dynasties and led to the establishment of Bahmani Kingdom in the Northern Deccan.

Due to the 14th century invasion the Hindus retaliated and rallied to build a strong new kingdom called the Vijayanagara empire. This empire included all the strongholds of Cholas and other local Hindu rulers to check the Muslims. Governors called Nayakars were employed to run different territories of the empire. Vijayanagar empire was the most prosperous dynasty in the south with Hampi as the Capital. But by 1564 the empire came to an end at the hands of Deccan sultans in the battle of Talikota. The empire dismantled into many parts and was given to the Nayakars to rule. Thamil Country under the Telugu Nayakars was peaceful and prosperous. The Nayakars of Madurai and Thanjavur were most prominent of them all, who reconstructed some of the oldest temples in the country.

The Dutch accomplished a settlement in Pulicat around 1609. The British, under the British East India Company established a settlement further south, in present day Chennai, in the year 1639. The British took advantage of the petty quarrels among the provincial rulers (divide and rule) to expand their area of power.

The British fought with the various European powers, notably the French at Vandavasi (Wandiwash) in 1760, and the Dutch at Tharangambadi (Tranquebar), driving the Dutch away entirely and reducing the French dominions in India to Pondicherry. The British also fought four wars with the Kingdom of Mysore under Hyder Ali and later his son Tipu Sultan which led to their eventual domination of India's south. They consolidated southern India into the Madras Presidency.

During the rule of the Cholas in the eleventh century, the Thamils living in the Island of Ceylon were able to consolidate their positions in the militia and the administration of the court. It may be assumed that more Thamils settled in the northern region during this period.

In 1215 AD, Magha of Kalinga conquered the Sinhalese kingdom with its capital in Polonnaruwa with the help of Dravidian soldiers. This invasion weakened the Sinhalese power to such an extent that any semblance of political unity in the Island disappeared.

After Magha, the Javakas led by Chandrabhanu came to power with the help of Thamil soldiers from South India and ruled over most of the territory that were previously under Magha. Chandrabhanu became almost a vassal of the Pandyas and was overthrown by them when he refused to send tribute.

The centre of power of the Northern Kingdom was the Jaffna Peninsula and hence it was known by the name of the Kingdom of Jaffna. Ibn Battuta, the Arab traveler who visited the capital in 1344 AD states that the Thamil King's power extended up to Puttalam and that he was in control of the pearl fishery.

In the middle of the fourteenth century, the army of the Thamil King had penetrated as far south as Gampola and had driven the reigning Sinhalese King from his capital.

Under the Vijaya Nagara empire of South India the Thamil kingdom became its tributary and there followed a protective relationship. After its decline, Jaffna came under the sway of Thanjavur and Madurai, two centres of power that succeeded the former empire.

The following are the names of the Kings and their period of rule of Jaffna Kingdom –

1. Kalingaman alias Koolangai Singai Aryan alias Kalinga Vijeyabahu (1215 to 1240)
2. Kulasegara Pararajasegaram (1240 to 1256)
3. Kulothungan (1256 to 1279)
4. Vikramnan (1279 to 1302)
5. Varothayan (1371 to 1380)

6. Marthanda Perumalan (1325 to 1348)
7. Kunapooshanan (1348 to 1371)
8. Virothayan (1371 to 1380)
9. Jeyaveeran (1380 to 1410)
10. Kunaveeran (1410 to 1446)

11. Kanagasooriyan (1446 to 1450). From 1450 to 1467 Jaffna Kingdom came under the rule of Kotte kingdom. Troops under the command of Chenpakap Perumal captured Jaffna. He was a Chera prince and adopted son of Parakramabahu V1 of Kotte. Later he became King of Kotte under the name of King Bhuvanekabahu VI. Kanagasooriyan fled to Thamil Nadu and came back with an army and re-captured the Kingdom and again ruled from 1467 to 1478.
12. Pararajasegaran (1478 to 1519)
13. Sankili Segarajasegaran (1519 to 1561). He was born to the third wife of Pararajasegaran.
14. Pararasa Pandaram, Pararasasekaran (1561 to 1565). Son of Sankili.
15. Kurunchi Nainar (1565 to 1570)

16. Periapillai Sekarasa Sekaran (1570 to 1582)
17. Puvirasa Pandaram II (1582 to 1591)
18. Ethirmanna Singa Pararasasekaran (1591 to 1615). (Set up by the Portuguese)
19. Sankili Kumaran (1615 to 1619) (Nephew of Above)

The Kingdom came to end in 1619 when the Portuguese finally managed to defeat Sankili. He was captured and taken by the Portuguese to Goa where he was put to the sword. The Portuguese ruled Jaffna Kingdom from 1619 to 1658. The Dutch who captured the Kingdom from the Portuguese ruled till 1795 and the British till February 03,1948.

This is a brief snapshot of our history spanning more than 2,000 years. But sadly Thamils failed to record their history in the modern sense of the word. While the Thamils excelled in literature, architecture, fine arts etc. they lacked historical consciousness. They had no sense of time and did not create a calendar like the Romans. It is with the help of Sangam literature attempts are made to reconstruct history. However, there are gaping holes in between.

Thamils 1800 Years Ago by V. Kanagasabhai is the first attempt to write Thamils history in the modern sense of the word. This work is based on a series of articles published in Madras Review between the years 1895 and 1901 with the objective of bringing out all the information available in Thamil literature regarding the ancient civilization of the Thamils.

With a view to confine strictly to the subject of the book as shown in the title, the author has carefully avoided touching upon the history of the Thamils before AD 50 or after AD 150.

This book describes the ancient geography of the land of the Thamils, their foreign commerce, the different races that spoke Thamil, their political history, and concludes with an account of their social life, mode of warfare, literature, philosophy and religion. Many historical works by prominent historians followed later.
The conflict between the Sinhalese and Thamils took a turn for the worse when Sinhala Only was declared the official language of Ceylon in June, 1956.

A peaceful protest by Thamil leaders at Galle Face green by Thamil leaders were attacked by Sinhala goons and broken up. Ceylon witnessed its first ethnic clash since independence when Thamil civilians were set upon by Sinhalese mobs. This was followed up with a series of ethnic clashes between the Sinhalese and Thamils in 1958, 1977, 1979, 1981 and 1983.

Massacres of Thamils is a chronology of Events covering the period 1956 – 2008

This book painstakingly records massacres that occurred between 1956 – 2008 from first hand information. Although the book is by no means complete the compilers have done a commendable job recording part of contemporary history without leaving it to future historians. Our gratitude is due to all individuals and institutions who laboured hard under trying conditions to compile this book.

These massacres were carried out by the Sinhala armed forces ably aided and abetted by racist Sinhala politicians. The genocidal war against the Thamil people has killed more than 100,000 Thamils since 1956. In the last phase of the Eelam War IV (May, 2009) 25,000 civilians died and twice that number were seriously injured. Sadly some among them are some of those who worked on this project.

Rev. Fr. M.X.Karunaratnam who functioned as the Chairman of the NorthEast Secretariat on Human Rights (NESOHR) was killed in a Claymore attack carried out by the Long Range Reconnaissance Petrol (LRRP) of the Sri Lanka Army on April 20, 2008 in Vanni.

The very first massacre deals with what took place in Inginiyakala on June 05, 1956 in the aftermath of the Sinhala Only bill passed in the parliament. This was the commencement of Sinhala mob terrorism against unarmed Thamils. The police was ineffective and remained mute spectators.

The book goes to record in detail a further 156 massacres giving detail account of names of victims, occupation and age.

The preface has been written by the well known Thamil activist Dr. Ellyn Shander MD. The book has been published by Manitham Publishers (www.manitham.net) the well known human rights organization based in Chennai. Thamil Nadu.

Inginigala is one of several Sinhalese settlements created under the Gal Oya (Paddippalai) Development scheme in the Amparai District. State sponsored Gal Oya Development scheme and Allai – Kanthalai in the Trincomalee district were major Sinhala colonization schemes in the early fifties that altered the demographic composition of the eastern province. I was working at the Trincomalee Kachcheri (1957 -58) when Allai-Kantalai scheme was nearing completion. This state aided colonization scheme reduced the status of Thamils in the eastern province from majority to minority. It created two additional electoral districts one in Trincomalee (Seruwila) and one in Batticaloa (Digamaduwa) district

The sinister plan of the Sinhala government is to make Sinhala people the single largest ethnic group in the Eastern Province. The temporary merged North and East has been de-merged in 2008 following a court order.

The master plan by the government in Colombo envisaged demographic changes through state aided settlements, tourism development and a Buddhist revival in Amparai District and agro-business promotion in the Thoppigala areas in Batticaloa District.

Population statistics will help to illustrate how demography patterns have been unnaturally altered or distorted through state aided colonisation, demarcation of new political and administrative units and accelerated irrigation schemes in the Eastern Province.

The Eastern Province is 3,839 sq. miles in extent. Originally Trincomalee 1,016 sq. miles and Batticaloa 2,823 sq. miles were the two districts in this province. According to the 1921 census, the Sinhalese were 3% of the population in the Trincomalee District and 4.5% in the combined Batticaloa and Amparai District. The Sinhalese were less than 4% in the whole of Eastern Province.

The Batticaloa District was divided into the present Amparai District 1,775 sq. miles and Batticaloa District 1,048 sq. miles in 1961. The following Table shows the demographic changes between 1881 – 1981 which is self explanatory.


Thamil population increased from 146,059 to 409,451 - 302%, Muslim population increased from 109,024 to 315,201 - 289%, Sinhalese population increased from 27,556 to 243,358 - 883%. The National average increase of Sinhalese during this period is only 238%. The sudden increase of Sinhala population is the result of Government planed Sinhala Colonisation in Gal-Oya, Pannal- Oya, and Ambalam- Oya in Amparai District, and Kanthalai - Allai, Morawewa, Muthalikkulam, Pathaviya and Mahadiuluwewa schemes in Trincomalee District.

We hope this book will give both Thamils and Non-Thamils an insight about the state violence unleashed against Thamils by a government bent on undisguised genocide. Thamils have experienced nothing but death, destruction, disappearances since independence.

The just concluded Eelam War IV had proved beyond any doubt that co-existence between the majority Sinhala-Buddhists and Thamils is not a possibility under a single polity. They are like dry and wet clay that will never stick together.

Any solution to the ethnic conflict should be anchored on the following historical and landmark resolution, mandate and principles.

1) The Vaddukkoddai Resolution adopted at the first National Convention of the Thamil United Liberation Front (TULF) on 14 May 1976. In this Resolution, the TULF declared its intent of forming a Free, Sovereign State of Thamil Eelam based on the right of self determination inherent to every nation.
2) The Mandate given to the TULF at the general elections held in 1977.
3) The Declaration at the Thimbu talks that any meaningful solution to the Thamil national question must be based on the following four cardinal principles:

· recognition of the Thamils of Ceylon as a nation
· recognition of the existence of an identified homeland for the Thamils of Ceylon
· recognition of the right of self determination of the Thamil nation
· recognition of the right to citizenship and the fundamental rights of all Thamils of Ceylon

It is now our historical duty to carry forward the sacred fight for freedom and not rest till the goal of a sovereign state of Thamil Eelam is reached.

Massacres of Tamils 1956 – 2008 is a constant reminder the precious lives lost and blood spilled should not be in vain. Aptly the book has been dedicated in memory to the thousands of Thamils who lost their life at the hands of the Sri Lankan State armed forces.

“No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.” ~Abraham Lincoln



SNE Thanked NESoHR and Manitham in attempt to document 61 Years Tamil Massacres in Sri Lanka

Statistical center for North East (SNE) thanked for NESHoR and India based "Manitham" human rights organisation on the publication of the book in several languages on 61 years large scale Massacres of Tamils in NorthEast of Sri Lanka, SNE release said.

Statistical center for North East (SNE) and NESoHR worked together in the recording of 61 Years Tamil Massacre in NorthEast of Sri Lanka. After the hard attempt of SNE, was able to released the report "Lest We Forget Part 1" at the end of 2007 and the next report "Lest We Forget Part 2" on July 2008. But the two reports only included the massacres which had been occurred before 2005.

Manitham human rights organisation has come forward to publish the two reports with some updates until the end of 2008 as a book in several languages. In this effort NESoHR is supporting "MANITHAM" and working with them on publication.

The release date for the book to be in December 2009.

SNE is still in active on the recording of Human rights violation against Tamil minority in NorthEast, should be noted.

The SNE release states:

The State sponsored violence against the Tamil people in the island of Sri Lanka mainly in NortEsat, has a very long history. SNE was established in middle of 2003, in order to record all Massacres in North East of Sri Lanka after the it's independence. The data collection project was started in middle of 2003 follwoing the ceasefire agreement between Sri Lankan government and LTTE. CFA allowed relatively free access to all areas of Northeast and SNE was able to recorded all events with the co-operation of Tamil interlectuals in North East.

Data collection permission was obtained from the District Secretariat (Kachcheri) and the help of the Grama Sevakar was sought to ensure all households were covered. The project was presided by Graduates from NorthEast and data collection team formed for each villages, containing University students and A/L students from North East, had performed a unique visit to each house to ensuring no household in the village is missed in the data collection.

Professors, lecturers and Tamil Diaspora human rights activists advised us on our communication strategy before and during the data collection and provided the vital information about the massacres and related photos kept with them for long period. We also received the evidence of massacres from Journalists, Sri Lankan government staffs, Library officers and several individuals who had been interested on the documentation of Tamil Massacres. Many of those involved in the data collection were received death threat by the Sri Lankan security forces in several occasion. The death threat appears aimed at pressuring the team to stop the recording of massacres in NorthEast. even the teams were actively involved and successfully finished the survey in time. We are thanking those who had supported us in several ways to document the Tamil Massacre in NorthEast of Sri Lanka.

At this time we remember that those who had been working with SNE, were killed in the last stage of war and several were disappeared or killed after screening process by the Sri Lankan security forces with the help of Govt backed para military.

Secretary General
Statistical Center for North East (SNE)

2009 December 24